Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:38:32PM +0200, Tels wrote:
If you have any ideas how to make this even more usefull, please speak
now. I will have limited email reading/writing capabilities the next two
weeks, but I *will* respond to all emails/critics/praises, even though i
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 07:33:04PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> > Not yet. Good idea. The relevant code is in parse_file() in
> > gen_graph - it gets as option one .pm file and then does something
> > with it.
> >
> > The lopp for each file is in gather_data(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Saturday 24 September 2005 00:15, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 07:33:04PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> > Not yet. Good idea. The relevant code is in parse_file() in gen_graph
> > - it gets as option one .pm file and then does something wit
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:03:32PM -0700, Jan Dubois wrote:
> > Ok, thanks. I'll let you know if I get any tuits to work on it
> > before then.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't it make sense to use
> Module::ScanDeps for this and put any additional heuristics in
> there?
Module::Scan
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 07:33:04PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> Not yet. Good idea. The relevant code is in parse_file() in gen_graph - it
> gets as option one .pm file and then does something with it.
>
> The lopp for each file is in gather_data(), under the recurse branch:
>
> I'll redesign the code t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Friday 23 September 2005 19:15, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:38:32PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> > If you have any ideas how to make this even more usefull, please
> > speak now. I will have limited email reading/writing capabilities t
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:38:32PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> If you have any ideas how to make this even more usefull, please speak
> now. I will have limited email reading/writing capabilities the next two
> weeks, but I *will* respond to all emails/critics/praises, even though it
> may only be when I