On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Simon Proctor
wrote:
> multi method ASSIGN-POS( $index, $new ) {
> @!arr[$index] = $new;
> }
>
This solves my problem with the first implementation, thank you for
pointing me to the ASSIGN-POS method.
Now what's left for me to understan
Maybe a given block then? I generally go for brute force first.
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, 9:21 pm Fernando Santagata,
wrote:
> Yes, the size of the object would change. In any case, I can't use a Perl6
> Array in a NativeCall class, so the point is moot.
>
> The problem is that that C library exposes
Yes, the size of the object would change. In any case, I can't use a Perl6
Array in a NativeCall class, so the point is moot.
The problem is that that C library exposes an API, whose main structure
contains an array of five pointers to another kind of struct.
It is not a pointer to an array of poi
Ahhh.. H. Even with the array as a private variable?
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, 8:41 pm Fernando Santagata,
wrote:
> Hello Simon,
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I would use an array if I hadn't the constraint that in a NativeCall class
> I can't use a Perl6 Array, just a CArray.
> Anyway I couldn
Hello Simon,
Thank you for your reply.
I would use an array if I hadn't the constraint that in a NativeCall class
I can't use a Perl6 Array, just a CArray.
Anyway I couldn't add a CArray to the class, because it would change its
size and I need to pass the reference to that class to a C function.
Here's my very naive way of doing it.
class A does Positional {
has $.a0 is rw;
has $.a1 is rw;
has $.a2 is rw;
has $.a3 is rw;
has $.a4 is rw;
has $.a5 is rw;
has @!arr;
method TWEAK {
@!arr[0] := $.a0;
@!arr[1] := $.a1;
@!a
