On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Adam Turoff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 08:07:33AM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
>
> > I think I would be
> > guardedly in favor of changing the default scope from global to local
> > (although I have the feeling there is something I'm not considering). What
> > does every
Dave Storrs wrote:
>
> >The default variable scope rules for Ruby (default: local) are
> >much better suited for medium-to-large scale programming tasks;
> >no "my, my, my" proliferation is needed for safe Ruby programming
>
> Actually, this is the bit that interests me. Mos
