Re: Epoch...

2004-03-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, note that the base date is different on Windows ... ... and depending on the compiler version and vendor. This is a snippet from an app, which of course was written when I was younger, but this was the code that accumulated to get a "base date" j

Re: Epoch...

2004-03-03 Thread Doug McNutt
At 18:46 +0100 3/3/04, Jos Visser wrote: >Nahhh Epoch should be 1-1-1970 at 12:00am midnight, *but* we will >have to allow for negative time values so that we can span either side >of eternity... That's not so strange. On of the, very few, things Microsoft has done right is to use floating po

Re: Epoch...

2004-03-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 7:15 PM +0100 3/3/04, Jos Visser wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:11:46PM -0500 it came to pass that Dan Sugalski wrote: At 6:46 PM +0100 3/3/04, Jos Visser wrote: >On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:37:09AM -0500 it came to pass that Dan >Sugalski wrote: >> >> FWIW, if we start getting into the

Re: Epoch...

2004-03-03 Thread Jos Visser
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:11:46PM -0500 it came to pass that Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 6:46 PM +0100 3/3/04, Jos Visser wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:37:09AM -0500 it came to pass that Dan > >Sugalski wrote: > >> > >> FWIW, if we start getting into the "What should our base time for the > >

Re: Epoch...

2004-03-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:46 PM +0100 3/3/04, Jos Visser wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:37:09AM -0500 it came to pass that Dan Sugalski wrote: FWIW, if we start getting into the "What should our base time for the epoch be" arguments, I'll warn you that the answer if I have to make one is probably Nov 17, 1858 at

Re: epoch for time

2000-08-20 Thread Tim Jenness
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Chris Nandor wrote: > At 15:02 -1000 2000.08.19, Tim Jenness wrote: > >I'm of the camp that feels perl should have a fixed epoch rather than the > >epoch of the underlining OS. Furthermore, I can understand that the OS > >epoch can also be important when looking outside of pe

Re: epoch for time

2000-08-20 Thread Chris Nandor
At 15:02 -1000 2000.08.19, Tim Jenness wrote: >I'm of the camp that feels perl should have a fixed epoch rather than the >epoch of the underlining OS. Furthermore, I can understand that the OS >epoch can also be important when looking outside of perl. Thinking this >over for a while it occurred to