--- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 5.005 introduced qr//
> >
> > $ ~/Reference/5.005_04/bin/perl5.00504-32 -le '$r = qr/(p...)/; $^X
> =~ $r; print $1'
> > perl
>
> If you're using it for any serious amount of nesting (ie. building up
> a regex
> with a bunch of qr's) it didn't
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 07:50:03AM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> >I think you misunderstand. The problem is not using relative paths in
> >chdir.
> >The problem is that @INC contains a relative path. So if you change
> >directories, the ./blib/lib entry in @INC is no longer valid.
I forgot to
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:52:53PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:42:52PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> > (Secondary reason for tests needing 5.6: as you, Schwern, pointed out
> > several weeks back, doing without qr// is just too painful!)
>
> 5.005 introduced qr//
>
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:42:52PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> (Secondary reason for tests needing 5.6: as you, Schwern, pointed out
> several weeks back, doing without qr// is just too painful!)
5.005 introduced qr//
$ ~/Reference/5.005_04/bin/perl5.00504-32 -le '$r = qr/(p...)/; $^X =~ $r;
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:42:52PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
Schwern: Do you think it's worthwhile accounting for this MakeMaker
anachronism in writing test files, i.e., providing an absolute path to
every chdir call?
I think you misunderstand. The problem is
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:42:52PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> Schwern: Do you think it's worthwhile accounting for this MakeMaker
> anachronism in writing test files, i.e., providing an absolute path to
> every chdir call?
I think you misunderstand. The problem is not using relative paths
James E Keenan wrote:
> snip
>
> The thing that puzzled me about Burnout's test failures was that they
> seemed to happen at places where the code was very mundane. We've
> been communicating on this list, Perlmonks, and off-list about it for
> weeks. We did confirm that the tests were
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 06:55:12PM -0500, Comrade Burnout wrote:
i upgraded to 5.8.2 (i think that's the minor version number .. don't
recall), and that "magickally" fixed everything.
i was running 5.6.1 at the time.
Oh. Did you chdir() at all in the tests? Earl
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 06:55:12PM -0500, Comrade Burnout wrote:
> i upgraded to 5.8.2 (i think that's the minor version number .. don't
> recall), and that "magickally" fixed everything.
>
> i was running 5.6.1 at the time.
Oh. Did you chdir() at all in the tests? Earlier versions of MakeMake
Michael G Schwern wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:32:47PM -0500, Comrade Burnout wrote:
>
>
>>But, some of the test fail because the previously installed version of
>>EU::MM ends up being used in the tests, and not the version in my local
>>dir (that I'm trying to test)
>>
>>
>
>Do your t
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:32:47PM -0500, Comrade Burnout wrote:
> But, some of the test fail because the previously installed version of
> EU::MM ends up being used in the tests, and not the version in my local
> dir (that I'm trying to test)
Do your tests run another copy of Perl? ie...
system
James E Keenan wrote:
> [[[ snip ]]]
>
>>>
> [snip]
>
> Let me point out one other anomaly which may not be the source of the
> problem. In the following line of output 'make' is using the perl
> executable in /usr/bin
>
>>> /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::MY" -e "MY->fixin(shift)"
>>> blib/script/mod
Comrade Burnout wrote:
James E Keenan wrote:
And, again, to rule out obvious problems ...
1. When you ran 'make', did you get output that looks more or less
like this:
FWIW, here's the full output of make ...
[ burnt ] :: make
cp lib/ExtUtils/ModuleMaker/StandardText.pm
blib/lib/ExtUti
James E Keenan wrote:
> And, again, to rule out obvious problems ...
> 1. When you ran 'make', did you get output that looks more or less
> like this:
FWIW, here's the full output of make ...
> [ burnt ] :: make
> cp lib/ExtUtils/ModuleMaker/StandardText.pm
> blib/lib/ExtUtils/ModuleMaker/Stand
Comrade Burnout wrote:
James E Keenan wrote:
Comrade Burnout wrote:
I'm not sure this is the right place to ask, but I'm at the end of my
rope here.
perl Makefile.pl
make
make test VERBOSE=>1
Did you include 'make' between 'perl Makefile.PL' and 'make test'?
yes, i did. i
James E Keenan wrote:
> Comrade Burnout wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure this is the right place to ask, but I'm at the end of my
>> rope here.
>>
>>> perl Makefile.pl
>>
> make
>
>>> make test VERBOSE=>1
>>
>>
>>
> Did you include 'make' between 'perl Makefile.PL' and 'make test'?
yes, i did. i just om
Comrade Burnout wrote:
I'm not sure this is the right place to ask, but I'm at the end of my
rope here.
I've been working with the ExtUtils::ModuleMaker author with some
beta-testing of new releases.
(part of `uname -a`)
FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE
( relevant perl -v )
This is perl, v5.6.1 built f
17 matches
Mail list logo
