RE: Difficulties

2001-09-15 Thread Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
Oh yeah...good point...:) This patch has been applied. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Will Coleda To: Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Sent: 9/15/2001 12:33 PM Subject: Re: Difficulties Um... with the current setup, there IS no Makefile until you run Configur

Re: Difficulties

2001-09-15 Thread Will Coleda
Um... with the current setup, there IS no Makefile until you run Configure.pl, so I really don't see how that's possible. =-) Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote: > > The README really doesn't have to mention Configure.pl because when you do > make test_prog it will run Configure.pl for you (at least it

RE: Difficulties

2001-09-15 Thread Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
I haven't had any problem with my instead of use vars...can you send me the test program that blows up? -Original Message- From: Uri Guttman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9/15/2001 8:57 AM Subject: Re: Difficulties >>>>> "

Re: Difficulties

2001-09-15 Thread Uri Guttman
> "BD" == Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BD> use vars qw(%opcode $fingerprint);#or strict will throw a tantrum so why didn't 'my' work. those are file globals from what i can tell. my causes interpreter.c to blow up. use vars fixes it. uri -- Uri Guttman - [EMA

Re: Difficulties

2001-09-15 Thread Uri Guttman
> "WC" == Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: WC> The README doesn't mention Configure.pl (minor doc patch follows), and WC> Parrot::Opcode is requiring perl5.6, which makes my 5.5.3 quite unhappy. i noticed both of those problems. i found Opcode.pm has a use 5.6.0 and it uses our.

RE: Difficulties

2001-09-15 Thread Brent Dax
Damien Neil: # On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:52:26AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: # > use vars qw(%opcode $fingerprint); #or strict will throw a tantrum # # Not necessary--the patch changes those variables to lexicals. # There wasn't any strong reason for them to be package vars. Oh, duh... *smacks his

Re: Difficulties

2001-09-15 Thread Damien Neil
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:52:26AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: > use vars qw(%opcode $fingerprint);#or strict will throw a tantrum Not necessary--the patch changes those variables to lexicals. There wasn't any strong reason for them to be package vars. - Damien

RE: Difficulties

2001-09-15 Thread Brent Dax
Damien Neil: # On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:15:57AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: # > As for the 5.6 thing...I think we're supposed to support 5.005 and # > above. Can you tell what Parrot::Opcode needs it for? # (And if it's for # > 'our', I'm going to punch someone... :^) ) # # Er...I think it IS fo

RE: Difficulties

2001-09-14 Thread Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
The README really doesn't have to mention Configure.pl because when you do make test_prog it will run Configure.pl for you (at least it is supposed to :) -Original Message- From: Will Coleda To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9/15/2001 12:13 AM Subject: Difficulties The README doesn't mention

Re: Difficulties

2001-09-14 Thread Will Coleda
Will Coleda wrote: > > The README doesn't mention Configure.pl (minor doc patch follows), and > Parrot::Opcode is requiring perl5.6, which makes my 5.5.3 quite unhappy. > > Are folks intentially using 5.6 constructs? I'll consider generating a > patch to make things work with 5.5.3 if this was