Re: Devel::Cover bug in ActiveState Perl for *Linux*

2003-10-13 Thread Ovid
--- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the key is that it is perl version 5.6.1. I can reproduce the > problem on a stock 5.6.1 on linux (well, hacked just enough to get it to > build). Hmmm ... I saw this *after* my second ActiveState email. > Actually, I wonder whether 5.6.1 sho

Re: Devel::Cover bug in ActiveState Perl for *Linux*

2003-10-13 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 01:49:58PM -0700, Ovid wrote: > After much research, I've managed to reduce a Devel::Cover bug down to > a one-liner which only fails on one box. This box is unique because > it's ActiveState Perl for Linux (not my choice!). However, that might > be a red herring. My 'pe

Re: Devel::Cover bug in ActiveState Perl for *Linux*

2003-10-13 Thread Ovid
FYI: I've managed to replicate this error on another ActiveState Perl linux box. The Perl -V information is the same, but the module list is quite a bit smaller. The only common element that I can find is ActiveState. Cheers, Ovid = Silence is Evilhttp://users.easystreet.com/