Re: DBI tests update

2004-05-15 Thread stevan little
Tim, On May 15, 2004, at 5:00 PM, Tim Bunce wrote: I think our mileage does vary as I can't think of any overloaded stringification in the DBI or these tests. I'm sorry, i read stringification, not "overloaded" stringification. You are right,.. we just do regular ole' perl stringification on the

Re: DBI tests update

2004-05-15 Thread Andy Lester
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 04:22:05PM -0400, stevan little ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This stringification problem may be a culprit, as we stringify 2 > objects to test against in the subroutine which is run in each thread. > But that stringification was there before in the old test (1.42), so I

Re: DBI tests update

2004-05-15 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 01:17:27PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote: > >Not having a threaded version of perl handy right now (I am home, it > >is at work), I cannot test this right now. The changes I had made were > >only to change a few tests to 'cmp_ok' and add test names, which > >should not affect

Re: DBI tests update

2004-05-15 Thread stevan little
Andy, This stringification problem may be a culprit, as we stringify 2 objects to test against in the subroutine which is run in each thread. But that stringification was there before in the old test (1.42), so I think maybe this is a different problem. Steve On May 15, 2004, at 2:17 PM, Andy L

Re: DBI tests update

2004-05-15 Thread Andy Lester
Not having a threaded version of perl handy right now (I am home, it is at work), I cannot test this right now. The changes I had made were only to change a few tests to 'cmp_ok' and add test names, which should not affect things. However in the last update (prior to this one), I did change the

Re: DBI tests update

2004-05-15 Thread stevan little
Tim, Not having a threaded version of perl handy right now (I am home, it is at work), I cannot test this right now. The changes I had made were only to change a few tests to 'cmp_ok' and add test names, which should not affect things. However in the last update (prior to this one), I did c

Re: DBI tests update

2004-05-15 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 11:47:39AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:16:00PM -0400, stevan little wrote: > > Tim, Andy, > > Could you take a look at this problem with threaded perl: > > t/10examp.ok 165/252Invalid value for shared scalar at > /usr/local/perl583-i/l

Re: DBI tests update

2004-05-15 Thread Tim Bunce
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:16:00PM -0400, stevan little wrote: > Tim, Andy, Could you take a look at this problem with threaded perl: t/10examp.ok 165/252Invalid value for shared scalar at /usr/local/perl583-i/lib/5.8.3/Test/Builder.pm line 319. WHOA! Somehow you got a different num