At 7:12 AM + 12/16/02, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
At 4:45 PM + 12/5/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
Now to get the hand of the signatures...
Ah, well, I gave up on SDL as it was a little complicated
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley wrote:
>
>> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>>There are ways to get around that, and there are some inefficiencies
>>>in the implementation there. I think we can work around some of
>>>those--I am rather tempted to have invoke
Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
There are ways to get around that, and there are some inefficiencies
in the implementation there. I think we can work around some of
those--I am rather tempted to have invoke promise not to alter
non-parameter registers or something
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 4:45 PM + 12/5/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
>>Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
>>
>>> Now to get the hand of the signatures...
>>
>>Ah, well, I gave up on SDL as it was a little complicated. Instead,
>>I played with curses. Plea
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:04:44PM +, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > At 4:45 PM + 12/5/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
> >>Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
> >>Ah, well, I gave up on SDL as it was a little complicated. Instead, I
> >>p
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 4:45 PM + 12/5/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
>>Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
>>
>>> Now to get the hand of the signatures...
>>
>>Ah, well, I gave up on SDL as it was a little complicated. Instead, I
>>played with curses. Plea
At 4:45 PM + 12/5/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
Now to get the hand of the signatures...
Ah, well, I gave up on SDL as it was a little complicated. Instead, I
played with curses. Please find attached a cute little curses life
program load
