Re: Continuation usage

2004-03-19 Thread Piers Cawley
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Hi, >>> >>> does the attached test use the Continuation in a correct way? >>> The test failes, what am I doing wrong? > >> Without running it I'm guessing that it p

Re: Continuation usage

2004-03-19 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hi, >> >> does the attached test use the Continuation in a correct way? >> The test failes, what am I doing wrong? > Without running it I'm guessing that it prints out something like > 456=789 > 456=456 > 123=123

Re: Continuation usage

2004-03-18 Thread Piers Cawley
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > does the attached test use the Continuation in a correct way? > The test failes, what am I doing wrong? Without running it I'm guessing that it prints out something like 456=789 456=456 123=123 And on running it, I see that I'm right. Remember t