Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> does the attached test use the Continuation in a correct way?
>>> The test failes, what am I doing wrong?
>
>> Without running it I'm guessing that it p
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> does the attached test use the Continuation in a correct way?
>> The test failes, what am I doing wrong?
> Without running it I'm guessing that it prints out something like
> 456=789
> 456=456
> 123=123
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> does the attached test use the Continuation in a correct way?
> The test failes, what am I doing wrong?
Without running it I'm guessing that it prints out something like
456=789
456=456
123=123
And on running it, I see that I'm right.
Remember t