On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:09:47AM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> This looks pretty nice.
Sometimes "dynamic" is remarkably convenient. :-)
> 1) (Can we|Will we be able to) do the whole newclass/addattribute/addmethod
> thing at compile time (in a :immediate), so that you have your classe
"Chip Salzenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got a partial solution to the pending question of namespace vs.
class.
Specifically, I've realized that Parrot already had most of a simple
solution to populating a class's methods even if the class has no public
namespace, what with the ".const
I've got a partial solution to the pending question of namespace vs. class.
Specifically, I've realized that Parrot already had most of a simple
solution to populating a class's methods even if the class has no public
namespace, what with the ".const .Sub" technique.
When I went to implement the r
{ copied to P6L for the "use case" question below }
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:18:27PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
> My concern is that, in an effort to work around this restriction,
> each language will end up implementing a workaround to hide the
> __parrot* namespaces: these workarounds will
