Re: Change to the calling convention, and other fallout from last week's perl 6 meeting

2003-02-14 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski wrote: *) The vtable split needs to be defined and implemented. I'd like some macros to access the vtable entries themselves, since there may be a number of structural changes and I don't want to have to keep redoing the code every time some element shifts from one spot to anothe

Re: Change to the calling convention, and other fallout from last week's perl 6 meeting

2003-02-14 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 1:09 PM -0500 2/14/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan -- *) There's going to be a bunch of named argument stuff that we should (though don't have to) put support in for. Perl 6 is going to make heavy use of them. I may be terminologically challenged here (if so, please forgive), but this s

Re: Change to the calling convention, and other fallout from last week's perl 6 meeting

2003-02-14 Thread gregor
Dan -- > *) There's going to be a bunch of named argument stuff that we should > (though don't have to) put support in for. Perl 6 is going to make > heavy use of them. I may be terminologically challenged here (if so, please forgive), but this sounds like passing a single pad as *the* argument