* Jim Cromie [2003/12/31 09:15]:
> the diag()s just helped me find the broken tests.
Isn't that what test names are for?
(darren)
--
In order to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the
universe.
-- Carl Sagan
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jim Cromie wrote:
> >ok() goes to stdout by default, diag() to stderr
> >
>
> which is, I presume, why perl -Ilib t/foo.t produces more output than
> make test.
> I see that as a feature.I guess note() should go to stderr - for my
> preferences at least.
Then just do *note = \&diag :)
> >
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Well, it seems Ive been abusing diag() for some time now :-O
Is there a 'right' way to do this ? perhaps just using ok() ?
ok() goes to stdout by default, diag() to stderr
which is, I presume, why perl -Ilib t/foo.t produces more output tha
Jim Cromie wrote:
>
> Well, it seems Ive been abusing diag() for some time now :-O
>
> Is there a 'right' way to do this ? perhaps just using ok() ?
ok() goes to stdout by default, diag() to stderr
> or maybe a new function, ex: note() is better:
>
> note.
Andy Lester wrote: wrt RGS feedback,
I don't get the rationale for this change; diag() is supposed to be
used for error/diagnostic messages, right ? not for comments, more
mundane in nature. (This perturbs the nice line-up of my test logs.
Go ahead and patch it. I'll add an "unless $ENV{PER
