On 2/20/06, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, /usr/local/lib is already in /etc/ld.so.conf.
>
> Perhaps you need to run `ldconfig` as root.
Yep - that takes care of it.
Cheers,
Rob
On 2/20/06, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:06:36AM +1100, Sisyphus wrote:
> > Yes, /usr/local/lib is already in /etc/ld.so.conf.
>
> Perhaps you need to run `ldconfig` as root.
>
> > $LD_LIBRARY_PATH is initially empty. If I don't add '/usr/local/lib' to it,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:06:36AM +1100, Sisyphus wrote:
> Yes, /usr/local/lib is already in /etc/ld.so.conf.
Perhaps you need to run `ldconfig` as root.
> $LD_LIBRARY_PATH is initially empty. If I don't add '/usr/local/lib' to it,
> then when I run 'parrot hello.pir', I get (transcribed):
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Glencross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Perl 6 Internals"
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Building parrot-0.4.1 on Win32
> On 2/20/06, Sisyphus <[EMAIL
On 2/20/06, Sisyphus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh one other thing on Linux I had to add (the standard location)
> /usr/local/lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I've not had to do that before ... and
> the README suggests that I shouldn't have to do it wrt parrot. It says:
>
> "But please note th
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Worthington"
.
.
> So
> I guess one answer is to try the latest Parrot, either from SVN or by
> downloading a snapshot:
> http://svn.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/
>
Thanks for the reply, Jonathan. A few things came up and I've not been able
to get back u
"Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My first post here. First up, is there a better place to ask questions
relating to the building of parrot ? If so ... where ? If not ... read
on.
Welcome to the list and yes, you're in the right place. :-)
I'm on Windows 2000, and parrot-0.4.1 builds
