Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Chip writes:
* optional parameter interface: ":opt_count" -> ":opt_flag"
So ":opt_count" should be replaced with ":opt_flag", which sets
its target register to a boolean indicating whether the
immediately preceding parameter was passed or not, rather than
Chip Salzenberg wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:48:20PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[ opt_count --> :opt_flag ]
If there is an alternating sequence of (:optional, :opt_count)+, the
:opt_count works exactly like :opt_flag, i.e. you get 0 or 1 depending
on the presence of the preceeding op
This is pretty long as is, so I'm going to leave out all the things I
agree with.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:48:20PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Chip writes:
> > * optional parameter interface: ":opt_count" -> ":opt_flag"
> > So ":opt_count" should be replaced with ":opt_flag", which set
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ sorry for the delayed answer ]
> I've looked over over the diffs between trunk and leo-ctx5, and here
> are my notes.
>{{ OVERALL }}
> A significant improvement. Good work, y'all.
Thanks.
>{{ USER-VISIBLE }}
> * optional parameter interface: ":op