Re: BabyPerl 0.01

2001-10-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 09:30 PM 9/30/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: >On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:57:53PM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: > > That isn't quite valid Parrot bytecode, because of the concat. Concat > > is currently documented to take only two arguments. > >This is because concat is broken. I think I need a ruli

Re: BabyPerl 0.01

2001-09-30 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Sunday 30 September 2001 04:30 pm, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:57:53PM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: > > I mentioned this idea before, and I've managed to implement a bit of it. > > VERY GOOD WORK! > > > That isn't quite valid Parrot bytecode, because of the concat. Concat > > i

Re: BabyPerl 0.01

2001-09-30 Thread Simon Cozens
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:57:53PM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: > I mentioned this idea before, and I've managed to implement a bit of it. VERY GOOD WORK! > That isn't quite valid Parrot bytecode, because of the concat. Concat > is currently documented to take only two arguments. This is because co