Re: Avoiding the deadlands

2002-04-13 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:28:33PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 4:54 AM -0400 4/9/02, Michel J Lambert wrote: > Right. A good spot for it is in either explicit DOD request ops, or > we require it as one of the ops run at block exit or something. We > may do a sweep when an exception's trigge

Re: Avoiding the deadlands

2002-04-10 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 4:54 AM -0400 4/9/02, Michel J Lambert wrote: > > So, I think #2 is the way to go. We'll add a new flag, >> (BUFFER|PMC)_stay_of_execution_FLAG or something, that gets added to >> allocated PMCs and Buffers. It'll be treated the same way as the >> constant/immortal flag is treated for DOD p

Re: Avoiding the deadlands

2002-04-09 Thread Michel J Lambert
> So, I think #2 is the way to go. We'll add a new flag, > (BUFFER|PMC)_stay_of_execution_FLAG or something, that gets added to > allocated PMCs and Buffers. It'll be treated the same way as the > constant/immortal flag is treated for DOD purposes, with one > difference--there'll be an op which sp