--- Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have started an implementation of m4 in PIR. See
> http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/m4.html.
That is amazing!
>
> The goal is to make a lot of tests work, and eventually getting a
> drop
> in replacement for GNU m4.
> The plan is t
Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have started an implementation of m4 in PIR.
The implications are staggering... Sure, plenty of
compilers can bootstrap themselves, but how many can
generate their own configure scripts via autoconf? With
p4rrot, we may live to see this dream.
On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 12:38 PM, Leon Brocard wrote:
We've used the Perl testing framework (Test::Harness, eg: 1..1\nok 1)
in the main parrot test suite. It's working well for Perl and a Parrot
version of it might be nice idea...
Anything that emits the Test::Harness protocol is fine. An
Bernhard Schmalhofer sent the following bits through the ether:
> Is there already a testing framework in PIR or PASM? For now I've just
> tweaked the Makefile from bf.
This looks excellent.
First, may I be the first to say that I'm happy that BF is the
inspiration for so many Parrot projects ;
