On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sorry this one sat so long. (Piers reminded me with the summary)
>
> It worked then '
And not for the first
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
>
>> Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> > I checked in more of PDD 17, detailing parrot's base types. Some of
>> > those types definitely don't exist (like, say, the string and bignum
>> > type...) and could definitely
Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
In the mean time i fixed some things that were wrong, added a few
functions and the tests. I found some weird things while doing this,
probably bugs. So here's the patch i promised.
Can you please rediff string.pmc - it is in the CVS already, but you did
provide the w
Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
I checked in more of PDD 17, detailing parrot's base types. Some of
those types definitely don't exist (like, say, the string and bignum
type...) and could definitely use implementing. Should be fairly
straigh
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
> Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > I checked in more of PDD 17, detailing parrot's base types. Some of
> > those types definitely don't exist (like, say, the string and bignum
> > type...) and could definitely use implementing. Should be fairly
> > straightf
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Ion Alexandru Morega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello, i'm new to this list and to parrot programming, so i decided to
> > start with something simple. I implemented a String PMC that is pretty
> > much complete, it compiles, but i haven't tested
Ion Alexandru Morega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, i'm new to this list and to parrot programming, so i decided to
> start with something simple. I implemented a String PMC that is pretty
> much complete, it compiles, but i haven't tested it yet. It would be
> great if someone had a look at
Dan Sugalski wrote:
I checked in more of PDD 17, detailing parrot's base types. Some of
those types definitely don't exist (like, say, the string and bignum
type...) and could definitely use implementing. Should be fairly
straightforward, and would be a good way to get up to speed on writing
PM
