At 4:10 PM +0100 2/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 11:09 AM +0100 2/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
makes me wonder, ifn't such method functions should get a PMC of the
class, for which the method was called
Yes... and no.
The class in which the method wa
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:09 AM +0100 2/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>makes me wonder, ifn't such method functions should get a PMC of the
>>class, for which the method was called
> Yes... and no.
> The class in which the method was found does have to be noted. I
> stuck a
At 11:09 AM +0100 2/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
makes me wonder, ifn't such method functions should get a PMC of the
class, for which the method was called
Yes... and no.
The class in which the method was found does have to be noted. I
stuck a slot in the interpreter struct for it at one point