Re: Another object question

2004-02-27 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 4:10 PM +0100 2/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 11:09 AM +0100 2/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: makes me wonder, ifn't such method functions should get a PMC of the class, for which the method was called Yes... and no. The class in which the method wa

Re: Another object question

2004-02-27 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 11:09 AM +0100 2/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >>makes me wonder, ifn't such method functions should get a PMC of the >>class, for which the method was called > Yes... and no. > The class in which the method was found does have to be noted. I > stuck a

Re: Another object question

2004-02-27 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:09 AM +0100 2/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: makes me wonder, ifn't such method functions should get a PMC of the class, for which the method was called Yes... and no. The class in which the method was found does have to be noted. I stuck a slot in the interpreter struct for it at one point