Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 9, 2003, at 8:43 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> > looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than later.
> ...
> > Not a huge task, we just need to order PMCs before dest
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2003, at 8:43 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>...
>> Not a huge task, we just need to order PMCs before destroying them,
> ..., but there isn't a way to
> ask a mark() method to set another flag. This leaves me stuck with
> regard to PMCs with custom ma
On Oct 9, 2003, at 8:43 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than later.
...
Not a huge task, we just need to order PMCs before destroying them, to
make sure we don't call the destructor for
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> On October 9, 2003 09:57 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:41AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > > We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> > > > loo
Thomas Fjellstrom writes:
> On October 9, 2003 09:57 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:41AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > > We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> > > > looks like we need to g
On October 9, 2003 09:57 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:41AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> > > looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than late
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:41AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> > looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than later. So, this is
> > a good chance for someone to burn tho
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:41AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than later. So, this is
> a good chance for someone to burn those surplus SAN points and become one
> with the gr
