On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:19:43PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2005, at 18:59, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> >
> >Would it make sense if it returned 0 rather than -1 on "not found"?
> >The implementation can never return a reference count of 0, because
> >keys
> >are automatically de
On Sep 8, 2005, at 18:59, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Would it make sense if it returned 0 rather than -1 on "not found"?
The implementation can never return a reference count of 0, because
keys
are automatically deleted when they are decremented to 0.
Yep. Just change it.
Nicholas Clark
leo
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:56:31PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >Following on our discussion on IRC, what I think we agreed on was that
> >Parrot should provide a new PMC class functionally similar to how the
> >dod_register_pmc/dod_unregister_pmc works. Quite probably it
Nicholas Clark wrote:
Following on our discussion on IRC, what I think we agreed on was that
Parrot should provide a new PMC class functionally similar to how the
dod_register_pmc/dod_unregister_pmc works. Quite probably it can share
implementation code with the DOD registration system.
Done.
