On Feb-25, Leon Brocard wrote:
> David sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > Thanks. I better upgrade my version, I'm not seeing it in 0.0.9.
>
> It's been a while since 0.0.9 (errr, 20th Dec). A lot has changed
> since then. Maybe it's time for a 0.1.0 release. What are we waiting
> f
Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And even toy languages may benefit from objects (yes, I really need
> objects in order to implement -98 version of Befunge, especially
> since I want to include concurrent-funge support). Well, I could use
> my own hand-crafted objects as a list of whatev
Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether:
> While I'll call C many things (not all of them repeatable) I'm not
> sure "toy" is one of them. Nor Forth, Fortran, APL, COBOL, Lisp, or
> Basic... :)
Granted, but those aren't the languages we're interested in. Parrot is
for dynamic lan
At 4:52 PM + 2/25/03, Leon Brocard wrote:
David sent the following bits through the ether:
Thanks. I better upgrade my version, I'm not seeing it in 0.0.9.
It's been a while since 0.0.9 (errr, 20th Dec). A lot has changed
since then. Maybe it's time for a 0.1.0 release. What are we waiting
fo
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> I want to include concurrent-funge support.
I'm not even going to ask :-)
Simon
Leon Brocard wrote:
> It's been a while since 0.0.9 (errr, 20th Dec). A lot has changed
> since then. Maybe it's time for a 0.1.0 release. What are we waiting
> for?
Dan said: "either exceptions or objects". Once we have one, we'll go to
0.1.0, and when the second will be implemented (order does
