At 06:24 PM 8/24/00 -0400, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Having a solid and correct reference doc for the output bytecode is
> > probably the single most helpful thing we can do for folks writing things
> > that munch the bytecode.
>
>Actually, I don't think that munching Perl by
bkuhn wrote:
> >I *think* that the consensus is that we should make it easy for people who
> >want to port to the JVM, or the so-called ".NET Implementation Language".
> >As the JVM porter, I'd like my life easy, but I don't expect perl6 to hand
> >me a JVM implementation---I just want to right co
At 05:37 PM 8/17/00 -0400, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>I don't think Microsoft's so-called ".NET Implementation Language" (I love
>how they appropriate words that are commonly used for other things; which as
>Simon noted makes searching hard anyway :) is really a "key" target for
>Perl6. For that mat
Simon Cozens wrote:
> I'm trying to find out some useful information on the Microsoft .NET
> Implementation Language, since everyone's raving about it and all I've
> seen is vapourware, glowing press releases and not a drop of code, and
> I'd rather see something a little more technical if it's wh
Simon Cozens wrote:
> I'm trying to find out some useful information on the Microsoft .NET
> Implementation Language, since everyone's raving about it and all I've
> seen is vapourware, glowing press releases and not a drop of code, and
> I'd rather see something a little more technical if it's wh
