From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:51:05 -0800
On Sunday 03 February 2008 11:15:38 Bob Rogers wrote:
> The first 3/4 of this should get fleshed out and added to the docs,
> which I'd be happy to do. Is docs/running.pod a good place?
A few bits may be
On Sunday 03 February 2008 11:15:38 Bob Rogers wrote:
> The first 3/4 of this should get fleshed out and added to the docs,
> which I'd be happy to do. Is docs/running.pod a good place?
A few bits may be technical enough to belong under docs/dev/ somewhere, but
docs/running.pod is definitely a
From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:03:12 -0800
On Friday 25 January 2008 07:46:32 Andy Lester wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:16 AM, chromatic wrote:
> > Did you test this with make testC and make testj?
> I'm unaware of testC and testj. So no.
Ok
On Friday 25 January 2008 07:46:32 Andy Lester wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:16 AM, chromatic wrote:
> > Did you test this with make testC and make testj?
> I'm unaware of testC and testj. So no.
Okay.
> I'm looking at the Makefile, and I guess I'm not understanding the
> differences between
On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:16 AM, chromatic wrote:
Did you test this with make testC and make testj?
I'm unaware of testC and testj. So no.
I'm looking at the Makefile, and I guess I'm not understanding the
differences between the various cores.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.pe
On Thursday 24 January 2008 23:20:45 chromatic wrote:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:11:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Modified:
> >trunk/src/exceptions.c
> > Log:
> > Added missing break to switch statement (!!!). Added checks for NULL
> > pointers
> Did you test this with make testC a
On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:11:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: petdance
> Date: Thu Jan 24 19:11:36 2008
> New Revision: 25208
>
> Modified:
>trunk/src/exceptions.c
>
> Log:
> Added missing break to switch statement (!!!). Added checks for NULL
> pointers
> --- trunk/src/exceptions.
