On Thursday 22 February 2007 00:28, you wrote:
> chromatic wrote:
> >> +if (saved_log_data == NULL)
> >> +return;
> >> +
> >> saved = saved_log_data;
> >> mem_sys_free(saved->reads);
> >> mem_sys_free(saved->writes);
> > I'm not sure this is the right fix; there's litt
On 2/22/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
'mark_extracted' should have the guard added. The same one should work.
As intended, it is marking all the read_records and write_records. There
just happen to be none to mark.
added in r17159, thanks.
~jerry
chromatic wrote:
+if (saved_log_data == NULL)
+return;
+
saved = saved_log_data;
mem_sys_free(saved->reads);
mem_sys_free(saved->writes);
I'm not sure this is the right fix; there's little reason to use an STMLog PMC
if it doesn't get a valid transaction log. My vo
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 19:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modified:
>trunk/src/stm/backend.c
>
> Log:
> [stm]: don't access a null pointer
>
> Modified: trunk/src/stm/backend.c
> ===
>=== --- trunk/src/stm/backend.c
