Re: [perl #82638] statement after nested if breaks fails to parse without newlines

On 01/24/2011 02:22 PM, Stephen Simmons wrote: > So <= needs to be surrounded by whitespace? Yes. > Is that true of all infix operators? Only for those that could be parsed as postfixes or postcircumfixes. But in general it's a good idea to use whitespace around all infix operators. Cheers, Mor

Re: [perl #82638] statement after nested if breaks fails to parse without newlines

So <= needs to be surrounded by whitespace? Is that true of all infix operators? Stephen Simmons On Jan 24, 2011, at 04:12 AM, Moritz Lenz via RT wrote: > Am 23.01.2011 07:48, schrieb Stephen Simmons (via RT): >> # New Ticket Created by "Stephen Simmons" >> # Please include the string: [perl #

Re: [perl #82638] statement after nested if breaks fails to parse without newlines

Am 23.01.2011 07:48, schrieb Stephen Simmons (via RT): # New Ticket Created by "Stephen Simmons" # Please include the string: [perl #82638] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. #http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=82638> I've attached two programs, wh