--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why should this be a PAST::Var node as opposed to
> simply
> > > using a
> > > PAST::Op node with :pirop('getprop')
> and/or
> > > :pirop('setprop') ?
> > >
> > > Pm
> >
> >
> > Why is this different than attribute access
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:23 PM, I Sop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Patrick R. Michaud via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [perl #59576] [PATCH] 'property' scope for PAST::Var
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Friday, October 3, 20
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 06:23:42AM -0700, I Sop wrote:
> > From: Patrick R. Michaud via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:16:01PM -0700, I Sop wrote:
> > >
> > > I just copied the 'attribute' method, renamed
> > > everything, and changed the parameter order for the
> > > 'getpr
> From: Patrick R. Michaud via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [perl #59576] [PATCH] 'property' scope for PAST::Var
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Friday, October 3, 2008, 12:31 PM
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:16:01PM -0700, I Sop wrote:
> >
>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:16:01PM -0700, I Sop wrote:
>
> I just copied the 'attribute' method, renamed everything, and changed the
> parameter order for the 'getprop' op.
Why should this be a PAST::Var node as opposed to simply using a
PAST::Op node with :pirop('getprop') and/or :pirop('setpr
