Re: [perl #53976] [PATCH] Remove tools/dev/ops_renum.mak

2008-08-22 Thread jerry gay
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:39 PM, James Keenan via RT >> 4. Parrot::OpsRenumber::renum_op_map_file() has been revised so that it >> will behave properly before Parrot 1.0 -- when deletion of opcodes is >> still permitted --

Re: [perl #53976] [PATCH] Remove tools/dev/ops_renum.mak

2008-08-22 Thread Will Coleda
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:39 PM, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The patch attached, diff.trunk.opsrenum.txt, is an improved solution to > the problem posed by Coke in the OP of this RT. Here are its features, > working from the surface (e.g., file name changes) down to the metho

Re: [perl #53976] [PATCH] Remove tools/dev/ops_renum.mak

2008-08-13 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 19:39:16 James Keenan via RT wrote: > Okay, thanks for getting back to me. Could you read the inline comments > I have inserted into Parrot::OpsRenumber::renum_op_map_file()? > > Do the comments accurately reflect what needs to happen re opcode > renumbering both now a

Re: [perl #53976] [PATCH] Remove tools/dev/ops_renum.mak

2008-08-10 Thread jerry gay
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 3:50 PM, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat Aug 09 10:31:37 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On Saturday 09 August 2008 06:33:46 James Keenan via RT wrote: >> >> > > What purpose remains, then, for either tools/dev/ops_renum.mak or >> my >> > > alternati

Re: [perl #53976] [PATCH] Remove tools/dev/ops_renum.mak

2008-08-09 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 09 August 2008 06:33:46 James Keenan via RT wrote: > > What purpose remains, then, for either tools/dev/ops_renum.mak or my > > alternative, tools/dev/opsrenumber.pl? Is such a program only intended > > to provide a number for newly added opcodes? > We haven't had any response to thi

Re: [perl #53976] [PATCH] Remove tools/dev/ops_renum.mak

2008-07-02 Thread jerry gay
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:03 AM, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Second, two notes about the branch: >> >> In a fresh checkout, if I 'make renumberops' with no local >> modifications, src/ops/ops.num changes. >> If I rename the op store_lex to barf_lex, and run 'make renumberops',