From: "chromatic via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 12:18:19 -0700
On Saturday 23 February 2008 15:48:23 Bob Rogers wrote:
> Oops; I spoke too soon. It turns out that r26025 causes the #50040 test
> case to break again (I checked that it still worked in r26024). S
On Saturday 23 February 2008 15:48:23 Bob Rogers wrote:
> Oops; I spoke too soon. It turns out that r26025 causes the #50040 test
> case to break again (I checked that it still worked in r26024). So
> perhaps the change chromatic made didn't actually fix it . . .
Are you still seeing breakage?
From: Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:44:02 -0500
From: "Peter Gibbs via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:57:13 -0800
Hi Bob
Please try revision 26025. This should be a full fix for the problem I
started working on in
From: "Peter Gibbs via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:57:13 -0800
Hi Bob
Please try revision 26025. This should be a full fix for the problem I
started working on in r25990.
Regards
Peter Gibbs
Works like a champ in r26026. Thanks heaps for the swift t
From: "chromatic via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:29:53 -0800
On Friday 22 February 2008 19:52:29 Bob Rogers wrote:
> The "[loading list.pbc]" message shows that it is dying in the
> load_bytecode op for this file. (If the bug fails to manifest, the code
>
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Rogers (via RT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 5:52 AM
Subject: [perl #51122] GC bug in bytecode loading (again)
To reproduce, unpack the attached tarball as follows:
copy. Then:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ma
On Friday 22 February 2008 19:52:29 Bob Rogers wrote:
> The "[loading list.pbc]" message shows that it is dying in the
> load_bytecode op for this file. (If the bug fails to manifest, the code
> will fail to find a *.pbc file in fairly short order.)
>
>In GDB, the backtrace from the segfault
