On Friday 07 December 2007 18:09:57 Joshua Juran wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:57 PM, chromatic wrote:
> > Everything looks reasonable to me, except q{} versus q{ } which are
> > barely discernable and offers (to my mind) only disadvantages over ''
> > versus ' ' which is much more distinguishable
On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:57 PM, chromatic wrote:
Everything looks reasonable to me, except q{} versus q{ } which are
barely
discernable and offers (to my mind) only disadvantages over ''
versus ' '
which is much more distinguishable.
Would "" vs. " " be a further improvement?
Josh
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 14:20:34 Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> when trying to convert languages/eclectus/t/harnes to
> Parrot::Test::Harness, I found that P::T::H did not pass the 'exec' option
> to TAP::Harness.
>
> So I added the 'exec' option, and removed the probably obsolete
> '--gc-d
