On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Having heard no objection -- in fact, having heard nothing at all -- I
> committed these revised tests to trunk in r21081. Resolving ticket.
Sorry, I didn't have a chance to test it -- the one test I did have a
chance to run failed on the gdbmhas
Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Tue Aug 28 19:35:12 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James E Keenan wrote:
I'll put a TODO block around it until I can get tuit.
TODO block implemented in r20894.
Well, that TODO block is around the wrong test, (it's th
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue Aug 28 19:35:12 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > James E Keenan wrote:
>
> > I'll put a TODO block around it until I can get tuit.
> >
>
> TODO block implemented in r20894.
Well, that TODO block is around the wrong test, (it's the test
James E Keenan wrote:
Andy, what revision of this file are you using?
A similar problem was reported on IRC just after I posted the file and I
uploaded a patch very quickly. I'm wondering if that patch failed.
Scratch that explanation. The patch was on 028-option_or_data.t.
I'll put a T
Andy Dougherty wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #44997]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44997 >
I'm seeing the following failure in t/configure/029-option_or_
