Re: [perl #42938] [BUG] allocation failures in res_lea.c

2007-07-31 Thread Mark Glines
On Thu, 31 May 2007 23:09:54 -0700 Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The code in utf8_encode_and_advance is beautiful. It basically says, > add a utf8 character to the buffer. Ok, now did we overrun the > buffer? CRASH! So if I add a call to Parrot_reallocate_string if the buffer isn't bi

Re: [perl #42938] [BUG] allocation failures in res_lea.c

2007-06-01 Thread Mark Glines
On Thu, 31 May 2007 23:09:54 -0700 Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Might be worth it to prereserve 8 bytes or so, to avoid having to > realloc as often, if this will be called a lot. Currently it just > reallocs the minimum necessary to fit the existing string, the new > character and a n

Re: [perl #42938] [BUG] allocation failures in res_lea.c

2007-05-31 Thread Mark Glines
On Sat, 12 May 2007 12:05:26 -0700 Allison Randal (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On x86 Linux (Ubuntu), this configuration fails 2 tests: > > t/library/string_utils.t0 134294 13.79% 28-29 > t/op/stringu.t 2 512252 8.00% 1 19 > > Both tests are fail