Re: [perl #41955] [PATCH] Yet Another PIR -- in C

2007-03-22 Thread Allison Randal
Klaas-Jan Stol (via RT) wrote: as requested by particle to send this to the list, attached a patch of an implementation of PIR in C. Instead of using a bottom-up parser (using Yacc), this is a pure-C top-down approach. This is quite cool! Keep us updated as you continue working on it. I'm h

Re: [perl #41955] [PATCH] Yet Another PIR -- in C

2007-03-22 Thread Joshua Isom
Two quick questions, what "hackish" things in pir are you refering to, and how much more do you think it would take to get bytecode working? Also, consider that file size alone is not the best indicator of how well something is programmed, as sometimes a bigger object file is faster than a sma

Re: [perl #41955] [PATCH] Yet Another PIR -- in C

2007-03-22 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
Hi, Joshua Isom wrote: Two quick questions, what "hackish" things in pir are you refering to, and how much more do you think it would take to get bytecode working? First of all, my words might have been to harsh. It is certainly not my goal to step any toes and criticize IMCC. So my apologies i