Re: [perl #41453] [BUG] Test failure in t/pmc/object-meths.t

2007-02-07 Thread James Keenan
On Feb 6, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote: Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 17:54 schrieb Allison Randal: This is a failing test Leo added in r16783. It looks to me like calling: o = new 'MyClass', $P0 actually should call init_pmc, rather than init, even when $P0 is null.

Re: [perl #41453] [BUG] Test failure in t/pmc/object-meths.t

2007-02-06 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 17:54 schrieb Allison Randal: > This is a failing test Leo added in r16783. It looks to me like calling: > > o = new 'MyClass', $P0 > > actually should call init_pmc, rather than init, even when $P0 is null. > Leo, are you saying the choice between init and init_pmc

Re: [perl #41453] [BUG] Test failure in t/pmc/object-meths.t

2007-02-06 Thread Allison Randal
This is a failing test Leo added in r16783. It looks to me like calling: > o = new 'MyClass', $P0 actually should call init_pmc, rather than init, even when $P0 is null. Leo, are you saying the choice between init and init_pmc should be based on the content of the argument rather than the si