Am Donnerstag, 30. November 2006 01:20 schrieb Matt Diephouse:
> Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We've basically run into the fact that there's no spec for MMD. I'll
> > see if I can provide a patch that just makes "_" match native types,
> > but I think it'll be somewhat more involve
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've basically run into the fact that there's no spec for MMD. I'll
see if I can provide a patch that just makes "_" match native types,
but I think it'll be somewhat more involved than this one.
It ended up being easier than expected -- implemented in
Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:43:59PM -0500, Matt Diephouse wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 05:50 schrieb Matt Diephouse:
> >> It also means that "string", "int", and "float" no longer work as MMD
> >
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:43:59PM -0500, Matt Diephouse wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 05:50 schrieb Matt Diephouse:
> >> It also means that "string", "int", and "float" no longer work as MMD
> >> types -- you can't distinguish between native
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 05:50 schrieb Matt Diephouse:
> It also means that "string", "int", and "float" no longer work as MMD
> types -- you can't distinguish between native types and PMCs. I think
> this is the right way to go now that we have au
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:49:27PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 05:50 schrieb Matt Diephouse:
> > It also means that "string", "int", and "float" no longer work as MMD
> > types -- you can't distinguish between native types and PMCs. I think
> > this is the rig
Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 05:50 schrieb Matt Diephouse:
> It also means that "string", "int", and "float" no longer work as MMD
> types -- you can't distinguish between native types and PMCs. I think
> this is the right way to go now that we have autoboxing; I don't see
> any reason to d
