On Friday 16 June 2006 04:38, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> This is now (r12950) fixed. I accidentally did also ci the patch. I hope
> this is ok - else just revert it (sorry).
It's okay. I had to rebuild Pheme, but I can confirm the fix. Thanks again,
Leo!
-- c
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 21:19 schrieb chromatic:
> I started to port Pheme's class names to the new keyed style. Â Applying
> this patch and rebuilding causes segfaults in some tests and multidispatch
> failures in others.
This is now (r12950) fixed. I accidentally did also ci the patch. I hope th
Am Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 21:19 schrieb chromatic:
> Oddly, I see these only when running through the Pheme interpreter, not
> when dumping out the raw PIR code and executing that.
(gdb) r -G pheme.pbc t/cdr.t
1..2
ok 1 - tail of three elem list should be two elem list
ok 2 - tail of two elem list
On Saturday 10 June 2006 01:44, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Patch missing?
That would explain the segfault. No seriously, here it is.
-- c
=== lib/PhemeSymbols.pir
==
--- lib/PhemeSymbols.pir (revision 17677)
+++ lib/PhemeSymbols.pir
On Jun 9, 2006, at 21:19, chromatic (via RT) wrote:
I started to port Pheme's class names to the new keyed style.
Applying this
patch
Patch missing?
leo
