On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:10 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun Mar 16 05:00:30 2008, bernhard wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm reopening this ticket, as there are still external Perl 5 modules
> > in lib/Digest, lib/File, lib/IO, lib/Pod.
> >
> > The Perl::Critic policies in lib/
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 09:40:58 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Wed Feb 27 05:59:58 2008, coke wrote:
> > I would recommend marking whatever version came with 5.8; If we
> > require a module that came with 5.10, we've effectively upped our base
> > perl requirement, and I don't think we're
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:33:49PM -0800, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> 1. Should 'lib/Test' be removed from the:
> no_index:
> directory:
>
> element in META.yml. I felt it should, because that directory has
> ceased to be part of the Parrot distribution. So I patched META.yml in
> r260
# from James Keenan via RT
# on Wednesday 27 February 2008 09:40:
>The output of Test::Builder changed at 0.64_01, which falls in between
>the 0.60 we had in the distro and the 0.72 which most (but not all) of
>our developers are likely to be using now.
>...
>Two possible solutions: Either elimin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:33 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Feb 26 19:02:04 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Patch applied tonight in r26082.
>
> There's a bit of mop-up work needed as pointed out by chromatic on #parrot.
>
> 1. Should 'lib/Test' be removed from
