At 8:57 PM + 12/23/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 01:37:18PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 1:50 PM + 12/22/02, Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
>Here is another approach, to finally unify the marking routines:
>- next_for_GC remains what it is
>- instead of current_e
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 01:37:18PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 1:50 PM + 12/22/02, Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
> >Here is another approach, to finally unify the marking routines:
> >- next_for_GC remains what it is
> >- instead of current_end_of_list and a return value, mark_used() uuse
At 1:50 PM + 12/22/02, Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
Here is another approach, to finally unify the marking routines:
- next_for_GC remains what it is
- instead of current_end_of_list and a return value, mark_used() uuses
a file static mark_ptr. As we don't have recursive DOD runs, this
