Tom Hughes wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Leopold Toetsch (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's probably best to do whatever C99 does, which I think is the same
> as what glibc does, namely to return the amount of space that would be
> needed to avoid truncation if the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Leopold Toetsch (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't look, if this is really intended, but I wouldn't like to behave
> Parrot_snprintf different then snprintf(3).
>
> It would also be nice, if we could have a return value, consistent with
> glib
