Mike Lambert wrote:
> ... Attached patch gets IMCC building on MSVC without
> cygwin (lex/bison/yacc/etc).
Good.
> t/rx/basic.t 2 512 52 40.00% 3-4
> t/rx/call.t1 256 21 50.00% 2
>
> Any idea on how to go about fixing the rx ones? They're failing on
> i
> > Is there any fundamental reason why we *cannot* just enter a generated
> > imcparser.c and imcparser.h into CVS and save users the step of building
> > them on these platforms?
>
>
> Ack, so we should just delete the lines:
> imclexer.c
> imcparser.c
> imcparser.h
>
> from .cvsignore
Yep, alt
Mike Lambert wrote:
> Is there any fundamental reason why we *cannot* just enter a generated
> imcparser.c and imcparser.h into CVS and save users the step of building
> them on these platforms?
Ack, so we should just delete the lines:
imclexer.c
imcparser.c
imcparser.h
from .cvsignor
> Mik
> > However, the intermediate filename 'y.tab.c' isn't necessarily portable,
>
> > if I remember my Windows and VMS lore correctly. However, those platforms
> > probably have bison, which understands the simpler -o imcparser.c output
> > option.
>
>
> So the first question actually is, is there a
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:49:07PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> By default, traditional yacc puts its output files in y.tab.[ch]. Thus
> my imcc/Makefile currently has
>
> $(YACC) -d -v imcc.y
> mv y.tab.c imcparser.c
> mv y.tab.h imcparser.h
>
> That's no problem, and works
Andy Dougherty wrote:
> ... make the barrier to running languages/perl6 as low as possible,
My concerns too.
(Some history)
- I sent all the patches to get P6C running with 5.005_03
- I'm currently 95% maintaining/pushing the per6 driver (perl6)
- last ~50 Kb imcc patches originated from my
At 02:06 PM 8/29/2002 -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:48:20PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
> >
> > > - Adds %option nounput to imcc.l. This avoids a warning when
> > >compiling the output file. This one is correct, at least.
> >
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:48:20PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
>
> > - Adds %option nounput to imcc.l. This avoids a warning when
> >compiling the output file. This one is correct, at least.
>
> Hmm. Sun's lex(1) doesn't understand that line. Is t
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
> - Adds %option nounput to imcc.l. This avoids a warning when
>compiling the output file. This one is correct, at least.
Hmm. Sun's lex(1) doesn't understand that line. Is there another easy
way around the problem? If not, I'll try to think of some
