Attached is my use case which is parsing of PDF cross reference indices.
There are normally three numeric entries per line. e.g.
xref
0 8
00 65535 f
09 0 n
74 0 n
000120 0 n
Which populates nicely into an array of 'n' lines of shape 3.
There's the rare, bu
Attached is my use case which is parsing of PDF cross reference indices.
There are normally three numeric entries per line. e.g.
xref
0 8
00 65535 f
09 0 n
74 0 n
000120 0 n
Which populates nicely into an array of 'n' lines of shape 3.
There's the rare, bu
> Well, what do you mean? Of course you can't put anything into it, and any
> attempt to index it will throw. It may seem useless, however, if you can
> have
> an empty array, why can't you have a shaped empty array?
>
Only if all dimensions are unindexable. Otherwise you have something with
inacc
> Well, what do you mean? Of course you can't put anything into it, and any
> attempt to index it will throw. It may seem useless, however, if you can
> have
> an empty array, why can't you have a shaped empty array?
>
Only if all dimensions are unindexable. Otherwise you have something with
inacc
How exactly do you index such an array?
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT <
perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> Indeed. The limit was introduced as a response to this ticket:
> https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126800
> The check is probably too
How exactly do you index such an array?
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT <
perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> Indeed. The limit was introduced as a response to this ticket:
> https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126800
> The check is probably too
