Re: [perl #126909] [BUG] no-args function call broken for some names
Parrot Raiser via RT wrote: >prima facie evidence they simply don't know about the feature. Or that they do know about the name scoping features. -zefram
Re: [perl #126909] [BUG] no-args function call broken for some names
If someone is using the name of language features for subroutines, wouldn't it be better at least to issue a warning of some sort? That's prima facie evidence they simply don't know about the feature.