> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > What I'm planning on is a VMS-style quota, privilege, and identifier
>>> system.
>>
>> Pagan heretic -- you shall burn in the purifying flames of RSTS/E!
DS> Mmmm, RSTS/E. And BASIC/PLUS 2.6. Now *those* were the days. Now,
At 7:30 PM +0100 8/17/04, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:01:31PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Yep, per-interpreter means per-thread. Each thread gets an
interpreter. (Logically, at least. There'll only ever be one OS
thread in an interpreter at any one time, though I suppose it's
Dan Sugalksi wrote:
>
> VMS's (and yes, for the grammar wonks, that apostrophe is actually
> correct)
I'd lay even odds that VMS would qualify for the "ancient proper names"
exception...
William Strunk, Jr. (1869-1946). The Elements of Style. 1918.
>
> II. ELEMENTARY RULES OF USAGE
>
>
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:01:31PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Yep, per-interpreter means per-thread. Each thread gets an
> interpreter. (Logically, at least. There'll only ever be one OS
> thread in an interpreter at any one time, though I suppose it's
> possible an interpreter could move from
At 1:30 PM -0400 8/17/04, Felix Gallo wrote:
Dan writes:
Anyway, there *is* a threefold plan, involving quotas,
privileges/capabilities, and restricted embedding environments.
If there's a link out there, I must've missed it. Is there one?
There isn't. I'll go fix that with PDD 18, Security and
Dan writes:
> Anyway, there *is* a threefold plan, involving quotas,
> privileges/capabilities, and restricted embedding environments.
If there's a link out there, I must've missed it. Is there one?
> >clock time (ulimit style)
>
> This'd be a per-interpreter, per-user quota.
Depending on
At 12:11 PM -0400 8/17/04, Felix Gallo wrote:
The summary: request for architectural analysis.
The motivation: there are certain languages, possibly including perl 6,
that will benefit from the ability to flow from one parrot interpreter
to another.
We could add a few keywords and call the language
