Re: [RfC] Header Dependencies

2003-10-28 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote: > Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Currently there 64 header files in include/parrot. From these 64 > > > header files 36 can be included directly, i.e. > > > #include

Re: [RfC] Header Dependencies

2003-10-28 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Currently there 64 header files in include/parrot. From these 64 > > header files 36 can be included directly, i.e. > > #include > > will compile, but > > #include > > will fail with errors

Re: [RfC] Header Dependencies

2003-10-28 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote: > Hi, > > Currently there 64 header files in include/parrot. From these 64 > header files 36 can be included directly, i.e. > #include > will compile, but > #include > will fail with errors. In the case of chartype this can be easily > fixed [1]. > Ot

Re: [RfC] Header Dependencies

2003-10-27 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be a good idea to fix the other headers the same way? Cleanup in the headers is for sure a good thing. OTOH I don't know, if its really useful to only include some headers. Some compilers can AFAIK precompile header files, so always having ju