Re: [Patch] Add support for tests in C

2002-03-28 Thread Josh Wilmes
OK- i assumed that target was OK, since it was in the makefile. I'll discuss this with you some more- perhaps this is the time to abstract away some of this building-things stuff. --Josh At 22:23 on 03/28/2002 PST, "Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: [Patch] Add support for tests in C

2002-03-28 Thread Brent Dax
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] # Could you be specific? I was careful to do things identically to # Configure.pl (because we lack any common code I can use right # now- that's # another problem we need to solve) libparrot.a isn't even the right name on Windows, and the target itsel

Re: [Patch] Add support for tests in C

2002-03-28 Thread Josh Wilmes
Could you be specific? I was careful to do things identically to Configure.pl (because we lack any common code I can use right now- that's another problem we need to solve) --Josh At 22:03 on 03/28/2002 PST, "Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # This should enable w

RE: [Patch] Add support for tests in C

2002-03-28 Thread Brent Dax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: # This should enable writing tests which call parrot C # functions directly, # which could be useful for increasing coverage to things which # aren't easy to # call via opcodes. And it will shatter Windows. Don't even think about committing it. --Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED