On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 20:12 +, Nick Glencross wrote:
> I certainly agree about what was being said about supporting multiple
> backends as it protects us against future nasty platforms. However, I'm
> unclear what the benefits of the favoured option of using JIT code was;
> that sounds like
Garrett Goebel wrote:
Nick Glencross wrote:
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall
as a way of providing NCI functionality.
http://www.haible.de/bruno/packages-ffcall.html
I actually really like the current NCI implementation, although
it suffers from a large nci.c
Nick Glencross wrote:
>
> As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall
> as a way of providing NCI functionality.
>
> http://www.haible.de/bruno/packages-ffcall.html
>
> I actually really like the current NCI implementation, although
> it suffers from a large nci.c file and all
On Oct 31, 2005, at 7:49, John Lenz wrote:
On Fri, October 28, 2005 2:22 pm, Nick Glencross said:
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a
way
of providing NCI functionality.
http://www.haible.de/bruno/packages-ffcall.html
I am a SWIG (www.swig.org) dev
On Fri, October 28, 2005 2:22 pm, Nick Glencross said:
> Guys,
>
> As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a way
> of providing NCI functionality.
>
> http://www.haible.de/bruno/packages-ffcall.html
I am a SWIG (www.swig.org) developer, and I recently started looking at
Nick Glencross wrote:
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a
way of providing NCI functionality.
Ok, here's an updated version with (hopefully) working callbacks -- at
least enough for a POC.
If you tried out my previous version, run 'rm */*ffcall*' befo
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 22:22, Nick Glencross wrote:
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a
way of providing NCI functionality.
http://www.haible.de/bruno/packages-ffcall.html
I've downloaded it and had a short look into sources. T
Nick Glencross wrote:
Nick Glencross wrote:
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a
way of providing NCI functionality.
I seem to be seeing rather strange, and it's probably a
misunderstanding on my part.
Ok, I see what the problem is. PMC_data(x) is a
Nick Glencross wrote:
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a
way of providing NCI functionality.
I seem to be seeing rather strange, and it's probably a misunderstanding
on my part.
I've pinched the GET_NCI_x(n) macros and accompanying get_nci_x
functio
On Oct 28, 2005, at 22:22, Nick Glencross wrote:
Guys,
As mentioned on the list yesterday I started evaluating ffcall as a
way of providing NCI functionality.
http://www.haible.de/bruno/packages-ffcall.html
I've downloaded it and had a short look into sources. The list of
supported plat
10 matches
Mail list logo
