FWIW, I really like having make clean delete *~. But since we have things
like make cvsclean, i don't consider it essential.
--Josh
At 7:19 on 03/18/2002 GMT, Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There may be a very good reason for this that I haven't determined but
> this keeps catchi
At 10:05 PM 1/2/2002 -0500, Kevin Falcone wrote:
>docs/Makefile should be removed by realclean, but isn't
>I though I saw a patch for this go by at some point
Applied, thanks.
Dan
--"it's like this"---
D
> Easy Makefile.in patch. I was worried that Win32 might need the linker
> (the change to $(LD) was submitted as part of a Win32 compatibility
> patch) but that doesn't seem to be the case. I don't have a MinGW
Fine here
Regards
Mattia
Robert Spier:
# Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs writes:
# >Ok, here is the rule based makefile...
#
# Thanks
#
# Looks good (and works for me.)
#
# I suggest the following patch on top of Gibbs' patch, to seperate form
# and function of CC and CFLAGS. (Also, the "standard" (fwiw) is
# CFLAGS, not C_FLAGS)
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:49:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This should be done with an implicit rule or a pattern rule.
>
> By putting all the explicit lines in, it'll be harder to
> change later, and errors can crop up.
>
> The makefile needs a cleanup - we're not making good use of
>
Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs writes:
>Ok, here is the rule based makefile...
Thanks
Looks good (and works for me.)
I suggest the following patch on top of Gibbs' patch, to seperate form
and function of CC and CFLAGS. (Also, the "standard" (fwiw) is
CFLAGS, not C_FLAGS)
-R
--- Makefile.in.1
This should be done with an implicit rule or a pattern rule.
By putting all the explicit lines in, it'll be harder to
change later, and errors can crop up.
The makefile needs a cleanup - we're not making good use of
any of the 'features' of make.
Are we allowed to use gnu makeisms?
-R (holding
Ok, here is the rule based makefile...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Sent: 9/16/2001 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Makefile.in
This should be done with an implicit rule or a pattern rule.
By putting all the expl
