Re: [PATCH] struct Parrot_Context doesn't need a 'prev' field.

2006-01-18 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Bob Rogers wrote: From: Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Why leave it in as a placeholder at all? Matt Good question. I did so because of the "common header with Interp_Context" comment in struct Parrot_Context. Yep. And this common header is actually used in e.g. mark_register

[perl #38261] Re: [PATCH] struct Parrot_Context doesn't need a 'prev' field.

2006-01-17 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matt Fowles # Please include the string: [perl #38261] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38261 > Bob~ On 1/15/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2006, at 21:

[perl #38263] Re: [PATCH] struct Parrot_Context doesn't need a 'prev' field.

2006-01-17 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Bob Rogers # Please include the string: [perl #38263] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38263 > From: Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:29:55 -0500 Bob

Re: [PATCH] struct Parrot_Context doesn't need a 'prev' field.

2006-01-17 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:29:55 -0500 Bob~ On 1/15/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2006, at 21:28, Bob Rogers wrote: > > >I had thought this field was being used, but it turns out to be > > irreleva

Re: [PATCH] struct Parrot_Context doesn't need a 'prev' field.

2006-01-17 Thread Matt Fowles
Bob~ On 1/15/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2006, at 21:28, Bob Rogers wrote: > > >I had thought this field was being used, but it turns out to be > > irrelevant. I offer this patch so that no one else is fooled (and > > because I had to test it anyway to prove

[perl #38242] Re: [PATCH] struct Parrot_Context doesn't need a 'prev' field.

2006-01-15 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch # Please include the string: [perl #38242] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38242 > On Jan 14, 2006, at 21:28, Bob Rogers wrote: >I had thought this field was bei

Re: [PATCH] struct Parrot_Context doesn't need a 'prev' field.

2006-01-15 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Jan 14, 2006, at 21:28, Bob Rogers wrote: I had thought this field was being used, but it turns out to be irrelevant. I offer this patch so that no one else is fooled (and because I had to test it anyway to prove that this is the case). Thanks, applied - r11199 leo