Alberto Simoes (via RT) wrote:
Sorry for sending the details this way, but to reorganizing these emails
would take too much time :)
[ Please don't top-post and cite only necessary parts during a f'up. ]
I've checked in a change (r9507) that hopefully fixes this bug (libgdbm
was loaded twice)
# New Ticket Created by Alberto Simoes
# Please include the string: [perl #37462]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37462 >
Sorry for sending the details this way, but to reorganizing these emails
would take
Well, here goes a stupid patch. Just removes the fprintf to the stderr.
If the function returns NULL on failure, callers should verify result.
Can't remember the name of someone who suggested right this. I just
needed to look a little more to the code to be sure it was the right(??)
thing to d
